Barack Obama recently made a campaign statement saying that as president he would help America become oil-independent in ‘our lifetime.’ Sounds like a wonderful goal, doesn’t it? But is it realistic? Let’s explore what life would be like if we rid ourselves of using oil (petroleum). Prepare to be shocked by the time you finish reading this!
Very few of us really understand how pervasive oil by-products are in our lives. Just about everything we use daily, is derived from petroleum (oil). But it’s very important to understand that the big user of oil is not your family car, truck or SUV. One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest of that barrel goes into making more than 6000 items using oil in the manufacturing of these products.
A good place to start on the list of these products is with you. You’re probably reading this on your home or office computer, right? Look at your computer and you’ll see that it’s made of mostly plastic (monitor case, keyboard, mouse, maybe even the screen if it’s a laptop). Guess what? Plastic is made from oil! Could we make computer components out of metal? Some, yes, but not the circuit boards or any wires that require insulating coverings made of plastic. So computers would have to go in an oil-free society.
At this point you might be tempted to call a friend to tell them about this article, but in an oil-free society there would be no home or cell phones – they’re made from plastic! Metal phones as an alternative? Nope, cell phones need view screens made of plastic and all phones still would need circuit boards, which are made from oil. And most of us enjoy being entertained by listening to music and watching movies on CDs or DVDs, but those are also made from plastic. Almost forgot a big item made from plastic – credit cards! What would we do without those?
Now look at yourself and what clothes you’re wearing. Anything with polyester in it? If so it’s made from oil! What about the carpeting you’re walking on – unless it’s wool it’s most likely made from oil. How about your other home furnishings? Anything made of plastic like the inside of refrigerators, dish washers, microwaves, then TV sets, audio equipment, toys, curtains and drapes, window shades, all plastic control knobs on everything, all PVC plumbing pipes and fixtures and of course the electrical wiring would not have the protective insulating covering that is made from plastic (oil) so that’s a big problem. Open your medicine cabinet and you’ll find medicines, vitamins and other personal products made from oil (petroleum). Say goodbye to KY!
There are many more items inside your home made from oil, but let’s step outside and see what else would be affected by an oiless environment. The power lines bringing electricity into your home would have to disappear because they require a plastic insulating covering. I guess power could eventually come from solar panels transmitting electricity via fiber optic cable, but then there’s that pesky problem of what to insulate those cables with that’s not made from oil. Take a look at your roof – got shingles on it? Hmmm, made from asphalt, which comes from oil! Do you live on a paved street? Again, if it’s asphalt it comes from oil. Same with highways and interstates across the country – made from oil by-products. Think about that for a minute!
Getting into your car, let’s look at all the things made from oil. Probably the entire interior is some form of plastic right down to the seat coverings. Oh, the seats may feel like they’re made of soft cloth, but most likely its polyester – oil! No point in thinking all of this could be made from metal and cloth (wool or cotton) because that isn’t practical or safe and would cost a fortune to manufacture. Besides, all the wiring in a car is covered with plastic insulation.
Of course all is not lost on divorcing ourselves from oil usage. If we’re truly serious about it, we could develop ways to eliminate most if not all petroleum-based manufactured products. Electronic equipment could be made from crystals enclosed in cases made from vegetable oil and TVs would have hologram images. Vehicles could be powered by and ride on projected magnetic roadways and highways could be made from cheap, synthetic concrete. Dwellings and commercial buildings could be powered by solar energy beamed down from satellites to crystal rooftop transmitters. Clothing could be made from special, genetically engineered plants. And for anything else that would still need to be made from or run on oil, present-day technology is about to produce engineered enzymes that convert waste plant material into oil.
I’ll wrap up this article with this question: How many things could you go without in order to stop using products made from oil?
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Think gasoline is the primary use of a barrel of oil?
Well, think again...it's not!
One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest (over half) is used to make the products listed here. If we stopped producing oil in favor of other energy sources, how would we replace these items?
Solvents
Diesel
Motor Oil
Bearing Grease
Ink
Floor Wax
Ballpoint Pens
Football Cleats
Upholstery
Sweaters
Boats
Insecticides
Bicycle Tires
Sports Car Bodies
Nail Polish
Fishing lures
Dresses
Tires
Golf Bags
Perfumes
Cassettes
Dishwasher
Tool Boxes
Shoe Polish
Motorcycle Helmet
Caulking
Petroleum Jelly
Transparent Tape
CD Player
Faucet Washers
Antiseptics
Clothesline
Curtains
Food Preservatives
Basketballs
Soap
Vitamin Capsules
Antihistamines
Purses
Shoes
Dashboards
Cortisone
Deodorant
Footballs
Putty
Dyes
Panty Hose
Refrigerant
Percolators
Life Jackets
Rubbing Alcohol
Linings
Skis
TV Cabinets
Shag Rugs
Electrician's Tape
Tool Racks
Car Battery Cases
Epoxy
Paint
Mops
Slacks
Insect Repellent
Oil Filters
Umbrellas
Yarn
Fertilizers
Hair Coloring
Roofing
Toilet Seats
Fishing Rods
Lipstick
Denture Adhesive
Linoleum
Ice Cube Trays
Synthetic Rubber
Speakers
Plastic Wood
Electric Blankets
Glycerin
Tennis Rackets
Rubber Cement
Fishing Boots
Dice
Nylon Rope
Candles
Trash Bags
House Paint
Water Pipes
Hand Lotion
Roller Skates
Surf Boards
Shampoo
Wheels
Paint Rollers
Shower Curtains
Guitar Strings
Luggage
Aspirin
Safety Glasses
Antifreeze
Football Helmets
Awnings
Eyeglasses
Clothes
Toothbrushes
Ice Chests
Footballs
Combs
CD's
Paint Brushes
Detergents
Vaporizers
Balloons
Sun Glasses
Tents
Heart Valves
Crayons
Parachutes
Telephones
Enamel
Pillows
Dishes
Cameras
Anesthetics
Artificial Turf
Artificial limbs
Bandages
Dentures
Model Cars
Folding Doors
Hair Curlers
Cold cream
Movie film
Soft Contact lenses
Drinking Cups
Fan Belts
Car Enamel
Shaving Cream
Ammonia
Refrigerators
Golf Balls
Toothpaste
Gasoline
One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest (over half) is used to make the products listed here. If we stopped producing oil in favor of other energy sources, how would we replace these items?
Solvents
Diesel
Motor Oil
Bearing Grease
Ink
Floor Wax
Ballpoint Pens
Football Cleats
Upholstery
Sweaters
Boats
Insecticides
Bicycle Tires
Sports Car Bodies
Nail Polish
Fishing lures
Dresses
Tires
Golf Bags
Perfumes
Cassettes
Dishwasher
Tool Boxes
Shoe Polish
Motorcycle Helmet
Caulking
Petroleum Jelly
Transparent Tape
CD Player
Faucet Washers
Antiseptics
Clothesline
Curtains
Food Preservatives
Basketballs
Soap
Vitamin Capsules
Antihistamines
Purses
Shoes
Dashboards
Cortisone
Deodorant
Footballs
Putty
Dyes
Panty Hose
Refrigerant
Percolators
Life Jackets
Rubbing Alcohol
Linings
Skis
TV Cabinets
Shag Rugs
Electrician's Tape
Tool Racks
Car Battery Cases
Epoxy
Paint
Mops
Slacks
Insect Repellent
Oil Filters
Umbrellas
Yarn
Fertilizers
Hair Coloring
Roofing
Toilet Seats
Fishing Rods
Lipstick
Denture Adhesive
Linoleum
Ice Cube Trays
Synthetic Rubber
Speakers
Plastic Wood
Electric Blankets
Glycerin
Tennis Rackets
Rubber Cement
Fishing Boots
Dice
Nylon Rope
Candles
Trash Bags
House Paint
Water Pipes
Hand Lotion
Roller Skates
Surf Boards
Shampoo
Wheels
Paint Rollers
Shower Curtains
Guitar Strings
Luggage
Aspirin
Safety Glasses
Antifreeze
Football Helmets
Awnings
Eyeglasses
Clothes
Toothbrushes
Ice Chests
Footballs
Combs
CD's
Paint Brushes
Detergents
Vaporizers
Balloons
Sun Glasses
Tents
Heart Valves
Crayons
Parachutes
Telephones
Enamel
Pillows
Dishes
Cameras
Anesthetics
Artificial Turf
Artificial limbs
Bandages
Dentures
Model Cars
Folding Doors
Hair Curlers
Cold cream
Movie film
Soft Contact lenses
Drinking Cups
Fan Belts
Car Enamel
Shaving Cream
Ammonia
Refrigerators
Golf Balls
Toothpaste
Gasoline
Labels:
alternative engergy,
no more oil,
oil independence
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Beyond Obama's Beauty
This article was recently published in The New York Sun, written by KENNETH BLACKWELL
It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.
We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender.
Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.
The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.
Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.
Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.
Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.
Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty."
Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong Il, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists — something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.
Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich."
How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" — hijacked — Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban — ban — on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.
The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.
But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and — yes — they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.
It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.
Mr. Blackwell, a fellow at the American Civil Rights Union and the Family Research Council, is a columnist for The New York Sun, and a contributing editor for Townhall.com.
My take:
This is kind of scary. According to The Book of Revelations...
The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??
It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.
We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender.
Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.
The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.
Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.
Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.
Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.
Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty."
Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong Il, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists — something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.
Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich."
How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" — hijacked — Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban — ban — on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.
The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.
But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and — yes — they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.
It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.
Mr. Blackwell, a fellow at the American Civil Rights Union and the Family Research Council, is a columnist for The New York Sun, and a contributing editor for Townhall.com.
My take:
This is kind of scary. According to The Book of Revelations...
The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??
Monday, April 28, 2008
The Choice for President Gets Even Tougher.
Come November and it's time to make a choice to vote in the 2008 Presidential election, I don't know what the heck I'll do. In my opinion, none of the candidates are qualified. Here's the latest damaging message for one candidate; Obama:
http://www.exposeobama.com/obamanationhe.html
http://www.exposeobama.com/obamanationhe.html
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Why Barack Obama Doesn't Salute Our Flag Hoax
The following came from a recent email and is based on a satrical view of the news rather than a factual response by Barack Obama:
Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171, During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart.
'As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides,' Obama said. 'There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.'
WHAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!
Unfortunately, many who received this have taken it as fact and passed it on.
The author of the above is JOHN SEMMENS: Semi-News -- A Satirical Look at Recent News
Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171, During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart.
'As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides,' Obama said. 'There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.'
WHAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!
Unfortunately, many who received this have taken it as fact and passed it on.
The author of the above is JOHN SEMMENS: Semi-News -- A Satirical Look at Recent News
Monday, April 7, 2008
The Global Warming Knowledge Test
Believe all the hype about global warming? Or are you a doubter like I am? Either way, you need to take this test and be amazed at the results.
http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/GWQuiz/Testindex.html
http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/GWQuiz/Testindex.html
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
The 2008 Presidential Campaign Dilemma.
I’ve been voting now for almost 50 years and never before have I come to such an impasse over whom to vote for. I don’t feel any of the candidates are qualified to be president and shouldn’t be president!
Barack:
Barack has a problem with his radical pastor Reverend Wright...and he will continue to have a problem if he becomes the Democrat candidate. There is no way Barack could be a regular church member for 20 years and not know what kind of hate-filled sermons were being preached in his church. He was and still is unwilling to stand up to his bigoted minister who for 20 years denounced from the pulpit whites, Jews and the State of Israel. And not only did Rev Wright preach like this from the pulpit, the church newsletter, "Trumpet Newsmagazine, of which Wright is the chief executive officer, published an article written by Wright in which he described the crucifixion of Jesus as 'public lynching Italian style.'" He also wrote, according to CNSNews.com, "The Italians for the most part looked down their garlic noses at the Galileans." Finally, CNN reported on March 28th that, "They [church bulletins] also quote a historian who said that 'what the Zionist Jews did to the Palestinians is worse than what the Nazis did to the Jews.'" Now, Barack says that IF he had known about his pastor’s radical views he would not have stayed with that church. So I have a problem with Barack’s lack of perception of the world around him and it makes me very uncomfortable to think of him in a presidential position.
Hillary:
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
I’ve also watch Hillary change her viewpoints and values from one venue to another many times to match whatever she feels the crowd wants to hear. This really disturbs me the most. Very successful con artists master this technique.
Click here for more. (link: www.northstarwriters.com/dancalabrese.htm)
The McCain Mutiny:
Every time I see John McCain he reminds me of Captain Queeg in the classic Cain Mutiny movie. He has a violent temper as witnessed by many in congress over the years. And he isn’t giving me any good reason to vote for him. I also feel he’s too old to begin running our country and even more disturbing is his admission that he doesn’t understand much about economics – yikes! No, I wouldn’t want to see him as president.
So here I am with nobody to vote for, but I don’t want to not vote at all. What a predicament!
Barack:
Barack has a problem with his radical pastor Reverend Wright...and he will continue to have a problem if he becomes the Democrat candidate. There is no way Barack could be a regular church member for 20 years and not know what kind of hate-filled sermons were being preached in his church. He was and still is unwilling to stand up to his bigoted minister who for 20 years denounced from the pulpit whites, Jews and the State of Israel. And not only did Rev Wright preach like this from the pulpit, the church newsletter, "Trumpet Newsmagazine, of which Wright is the chief executive officer, published an article written by Wright in which he described the crucifixion of Jesus as 'public lynching Italian style.'" He also wrote, according to CNSNews.com, "The Italians for the most part looked down their garlic noses at the Galileans." Finally, CNN reported on March 28th that, "They [church bulletins] also quote a historian who said that 'what the Zionist Jews did to the Palestinians is worse than what the Nazis did to the Jews.'" Now, Barack says that IF he had known about his pastor’s radical views he would not have stayed with that church. So I have a problem with Barack’s lack of perception of the world around him and it makes me very uncomfortable to think of him in a presidential position.
Hillary:
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about being under sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
I’ve also watch Hillary change her viewpoints and values from one venue to another many times to match whatever she feels the crowd wants to hear. This really disturbs me the most. Very successful con artists master this technique.
Click here for more. (link: www.northstarwriters.com/dancalabrese.htm)
The McCain Mutiny:
Every time I see John McCain he reminds me of Captain Queeg in the classic Cain Mutiny movie. He has a violent temper as witnessed by many in congress over the years. And he isn’t giving me any good reason to vote for him. I also feel he’s too old to begin running our country and even more disturbing is his admission that he doesn’t understand much about economics – yikes! No, I wouldn’t want to see him as president.
So here I am with nobody to vote for, but I don’t want to not vote at all. What a predicament!
Labels:
barack obama,
hillary clinton,
john mccain,
reverend wright,
sniper fire
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Work From Home Business: Ad Agency
Establishing and Operating a Home-Based Advertising Agency:
Here’s a business that many people don’t think about because it sounds too complicated, but operating a home-based ad agency is possible. Here are some facts on how to do that based on my own experience.
Basic print advertising-oriented agency business. In this simple agency business, you’ll provide businesses a resource to create ads and submit them to local newspaper and magazines. You may also design and print brochures, catalogs and similar printed materials. Here’s what you’ll need to know:
Some basic advertising knowledge is necessary. By this I mean, you should have a general understanding of how advertising is used by businesses to sell their products or services.If you don’t have a creative background so that you can design ads for your customers, search the Yellow Pages in your local phonebook for Commercial Artists or Freelance Artists or search the Internet. Aligning yourself with these resources is mandatory in order to produce ads for your clients.
You’ll also need copywriting sources that you can find the same way you find artists. Of course if you have the ability to write your own copy and design your own ads…that’s a big advantage.
How you make money:
In this simple ad agency business your profit comes from two sources:When you create ads, brochures, catalogs or any printed materials you will get paid for your creativity and the production of the materials. Most agencies quote flat project prices to clients based on their estimate of the number of creative/production hours needed. Depending on your skills and local rates for creative services, you can expect to be paid between $35 - $200 per hour.
When you place ads in newspapers and magazines for clients, you will earn the standard 15% ad agency commission on each ad each time it runs. Publications have two ad rates: Retail and Ad Agency. If your client placed their own ads they would pay the Retail Ad Rate, while recognized agencies pay the Ad Agency rate that is 15% off the Retail rate.If you graduate to a larger ad agency and can offer clients TV and Radio commercials as well as Internet advertising services, then your production profits and commissions grow considerably.
The one thing to understand about running an ad agency is that those commissions you earn from placing advertising for clients are residual. If you create an ad that runs in every issue of a publication, you’ll earn a commission each time the ad runs – while you’re working on other projects and business development.
Are there any downsides to ad agency ownership? Just like any business, you have to protect yourself from loss. The biggest risk in running an ad agency is non-payment by clients for ads running in publications. Typically, an ad agency will obligate itself for a client by purchasing ad space on the client’s behalf and when each ad has been published the agency will invoice the client to be paid. It’s important to understand that as an ad agency owner when you place ads for clients, the publication is contracting with you…not your client, so you are responsible to pay the media bills. If a client doesn’t pay you, for whatever reason, the publication will still expect you to pay the media bill. I made sure my agency would not be in that financial position by requiring advance payment on ads to be published. I lost a few clients with that policy, but that later turned out to be a smart move because they went out of business and left another agency to pay their media bills.
The only other downside to this business is long workweeks. Sometimes in order to meet ad deadlines it will be necessary to put in late-night hours and even work weekends and holidays. However, hard work is where the profit lies and you’ll eventually have the ability to take leisure time off while others are putting in their 9-5 hours at a job they don’t like.
There are many other facets to this business that I’ll cover in the future. In the meantime, feel free to post your questions or comments here.
Here’s a business that many people don’t think about because it sounds too complicated, but operating a home-based ad agency is possible. Here are some facts on how to do that based on my own experience.
Basic print advertising-oriented agency business. In this simple agency business, you’ll provide businesses a resource to create ads and submit them to local newspaper and magazines. You may also design and print brochures, catalogs and similar printed materials. Here’s what you’ll need to know:
Some basic advertising knowledge is necessary. By this I mean, you should have a general understanding of how advertising is used by businesses to sell their products or services.If you don’t have a creative background so that you can design ads for your customers, search the Yellow Pages in your local phonebook for Commercial Artists or Freelance Artists or search the Internet. Aligning yourself with these resources is mandatory in order to produce ads for your clients.
You’ll also need copywriting sources that you can find the same way you find artists. Of course if you have the ability to write your own copy and design your own ads…that’s a big advantage.
How you make money:
In this simple ad agency business your profit comes from two sources:When you create ads, brochures, catalogs or any printed materials you will get paid for your creativity and the production of the materials. Most agencies quote flat project prices to clients based on their estimate of the number of creative/production hours needed. Depending on your skills and local rates for creative services, you can expect to be paid between $35 - $200 per hour.
When you place ads in newspapers and magazines for clients, you will earn the standard 15% ad agency commission on each ad each time it runs. Publications have two ad rates: Retail and Ad Agency. If your client placed their own ads they would pay the Retail Ad Rate, while recognized agencies pay the Ad Agency rate that is 15% off the Retail rate.If you graduate to a larger ad agency and can offer clients TV and Radio commercials as well as Internet advertising services, then your production profits and commissions grow considerably.
The one thing to understand about running an ad agency is that those commissions you earn from placing advertising for clients are residual. If you create an ad that runs in every issue of a publication, you’ll earn a commission each time the ad runs – while you’re working on other projects and business development.
Are there any downsides to ad agency ownership? Just like any business, you have to protect yourself from loss. The biggest risk in running an ad agency is non-payment by clients for ads running in publications. Typically, an ad agency will obligate itself for a client by purchasing ad space on the client’s behalf and when each ad has been published the agency will invoice the client to be paid. It’s important to understand that as an ad agency owner when you place ads for clients, the publication is contracting with you…not your client, so you are responsible to pay the media bills. If a client doesn’t pay you, for whatever reason, the publication will still expect you to pay the media bill. I made sure my agency would not be in that financial position by requiring advance payment on ads to be published. I lost a few clients with that policy, but that later turned out to be a smart move because they went out of business and left another agency to pay their media bills.
The only other downside to this business is long workweeks. Sometimes in order to meet ad deadlines it will be necessary to put in late-night hours and even work weekends and holidays. However, hard work is where the profit lies and you’ll eventually have the ability to take leisure time off while others are putting in their 9-5 hours at a job they don’t like.
There are many other facets to this business that I’ll cover in the future. In the meantime, feel free to post your questions or comments here.
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Pet Peeve #2 - People Versus Cars in Parking Lots
I’m wondering if this phenomenon is akin only to the south; Florida specifically.
You’re in a WalMart parking lot and you’re carefully backing out of your parking space between two SUVs. As you edge out and hope to not get nailed by another car, you have to jam the brakes to avoid hitting a woman and kids who walk right behind your moving car!
This happens so often now that it’s becoming routine and expected. No matter how far out your car is people will continue to walk right behind your car. It’s almost as though the protected walkways, where you can step into these zones and cars must yield to pedestrians, has carried over to walking anywhere in a parking lot. Either that or these people figure you can see them and you’ll stop rather than hit them.
What is it with these idiots anyway? So is this a WalMart customer mentality everywhere, or is it peculiar only to Floridians?
I really want to install some huge truck air horns at the back of my car and blast the pants off these stupid people when they deliberately walk behind my car daring me to hit them. Maybe 190 decibels and a sudden rush of air will wake them up!
You’re in a WalMart parking lot and you’re carefully backing out of your parking space between two SUVs. As you edge out and hope to not get nailed by another car, you have to jam the brakes to avoid hitting a woman and kids who walk right behind your moving car!
This happens so often now that it’s becoming routine and expected. No matter how far out your car is people will continue to walk right behind your car. It’s almost as though the protected walkways, where you can step into these zones and cars must yield to pedestrians, has carried over to walking anywhere in a parking lot. Either that or these people figure you can see them and you’ll stop rather than hit them.
What is it with these idiots anyway? So is this a WalMart customer mentality everywhere, or is it peculiar only to Floridians?
I really want to install some huge truck air horns at the back of my car and blast the pants off these stupid people when they deliberately walk behind my car daring me to hit them. Maybe 190 decibels and a sudden rush of air will wake them up!
Saturday, March 22, 2008
FREE eBooks
Just a quick note to mention that I am gradually adding good quality FREE eBooks to one of my sites. Click the link in my Fav Links to go there.
Although I have a fair number of ebooks already in my library, I are constantly adding more. Check my site frequently for the latest additions.
All ebooks are completely free and you can even give them away to your family and friends.
Keep in mind that although some ebooks may not be very well written, you will usually still find very useful information contained in them.
Although I have a fair number of ebooks already in my library, I are constantly adding more. Check my site frequently for the latest additions.
All ebooks are completely free and you can even give them away to your family and friends.
Keep in mind that although some ebooks may not be very well written, you will usually still find very useful information contained in them.
Labels:
digital ebooks,
e-books,
ebooks,
free books,
online free books
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

